Davis v. Arvest Bank
This text of Davis v. Arvest Bank (Davis v. Arvest Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ANTHONY DAVIS PLAINTIFF Vv. No. 4:25-cv-34-DPM
ARVEST BANK DEFENDANT
ORDER 1. Davis's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted for good cause. 2. The Court must screen Davis’s complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court has also reviewed his recent notice, Doc. 3, which contains correspondence between him and Arvest Bank about a $100,000 loan application and two of Davis’s Arvest accounts. Davis says his complaint raises a federal question. Doc. 2 at 3. But nothing in the complaint, or in Davis’s notice, makes clear what that question is. The Court has reviewed the federal statutes Davis invokes in his complaint. None provide him—a private citizen—with a cause of action, regardless of the circumstances here. Without more information, the Court cannot determine whether Davis has a plausible claim. Mick v. Raines, 883 F.3d 1075, 1079 (8th Cir. 2018). The Court will therefore dismiss Davis’s case without prejudice unless he files an amended complaint by 7 March 2025 that clarifies the legal basis and factual basis of his lawsuit.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 3 tehnvany 2025
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis v. Arvest Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-arvest-bank-ared-2025.