Davis v. Arundel Corp.

187 So. 2d 894, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3347
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 29, 1966
DocketNo. 35169
StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 894 (Davis v. Arundel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Arundel Corp., 187 So. 2d 894, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3347 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for certiorari we are requested to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission affirming an order previously entered by a deputy commissioner.

Our consideration of the record and briefs of counsel, after waiver of oral argument, leads us to the conclusion that the order of the Full Commission is without error. Certiorari is denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Petitioner Moses Davis is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 2d 894, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-arundel-corp-fla-1966.