Davis v. Armstrong

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60694

Conference Calendar

__________________

ALFA DAVIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:95-CV-274-S-A

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Alfa Davis argues that the district court erred in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint because there were not adequate state post-deprivation remedies available to him.

We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district court, and the brief, and find that the dismissal of the complaint should be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court, see Davis v. Armstrong, No. 4:95-CV-274-S- A (N.D. Miss. Oct. 25, 1995), although on a different procedural

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 95-60694

-2-

basis. See Holloway v. Gunnell, 685 F.2d 150, 152 (5th Cir. 1982).

AFFIRMED.