Davis v. Aladdin Investment Co.

133 So. 112, 101 Fla. 1382
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 1, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order. It is therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said *1383 order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Buford, O.J., and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Aladdin Investment Co., 133 So. 112, 101 Fla. 1382 (Fla. 1931).

133 So. 112 (Davis v. Aladdin Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rountree v. Rountree
72 So. 2d 794 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)