Davis v. Alabama Department of Human Resources

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana
DecidedFebruary 17, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-00266
StatusUnknown

This text of Davis v. Alabama Department of Human Resources (Davis v. Alabama Department of Human Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Alabama Department of Human Resources, (N.D. Ind. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

JOHN H. DAVIS, SHELIA D. DAVIS, and ERIC S. DAVIS,

Plaintiffs,

v. CAUSE NO.: 2:20-CV-266-TLS-APR

LIMESTONE COUNTY ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al.,

Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Verified Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Without Notice [ECF No. 79], a Verified Emergency Motion for Relief [ECF No. 80], and a Verified Motion for Preliminary Injunction Relief [ECF No. 81], filed by John H. Davis and Shelia D. Davis on February 15, 2021. On October 12, 2020, the Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Dismissal Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) [ECF No. 74], which dismissed the case without prejudice, see Oct. 16, 2020 Order, ECF No. 77. The voluntary dismissal is self-executing and closed the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) (“Without a Court Order”); Jenkins v. Village of Maywood, 506 F.3d 622, 624 (7th Cir. 2007). “A suit that is voluntarily dismissed under Rule 41(a) generally is treated as if it had never been filed.” Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (citing Smith v. Potter, 513 F.3d 781, 783 (7th Cir. 2008); Beck v. Caterpillar, Inc., 50 F.3d 405, 407 (7th Cir. 1995)). “Once an action has been dismissed under Rule 41(a)(1) without prejudice, the plaintiff may bring the suit again by filing a new complaint.” Id. at 588 (citing Richmond v. Chater, 94 F.3d 263, 267 (7th Cir. 1996); Adams v. Lever Bros. Co., 874 F.2d 393, 395–96 (7th Cir. 1989); McCall–Bey v. Franzen, 777 F.2d 1178, 1184 (7th Cir. 1985); Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 (“A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.”)). In this case, the voluntary dismissal on October 12, 2020, terminated this action, and the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the three pending motions. See Nelson, 657 F.3d at 588–89 (discussing the limited matters over which a court has jurisdiction following voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)).

Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the Verified Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Without Notice [ECF No. 79], the Verified Emergency Motion for Relief [ECF No. 80], and the Verified Motion for Preliminary Injunction Relief [ECF No. 81]. Any relief based on these motions must be filed in a new cause of action under a new cause number. SO ORDERED on February 17, 2021. s/ Theresa L. Springmann JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davis v. Alabama Department of Human Resources, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-alabama-department-of-human-resources-innd-2021.