Davis v. Adams

4 Cow. 142
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1825
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Cow. 142 (Davis v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Adams, 4 Cow. 142 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).

Opinion

Curia.

The .plaintiff should either have retained his de'tirrerj and gone to argument upon the calendar, or confessed the defendant’s plea, taking a judgment to he levied °f his goods and chattels; or have taken -issue, .suffered a verdict for the defendant, and then moved for judgment non ' obstante veredicto, as was done in Whittimore v. Adams. The defendant ds;entitled to retain his plea upon the record, and have it passed upon by the Court, with a view to his writ of error. Therule -for judgment must he set aside with costs ; but under the special circumstances of this case, the plaintiff may enter up judgment as upon the demurrer and joinder heretofore interposed in the case.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darrow v. Miller
5 How. Pr. 247 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Cow. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-adams-nysupct-1825.