Davis v. ACEO, LLC EX REL. RPO ASSOCIATES

334 S.W.3d 927, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 426, 2011 WL 1120021
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 2011·No. ED 95046·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Davis (Davis) appeals from the finding of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) that he was not entitled to unemployment benefits resulting from his work for ACEO, LLC for RPO Associates, Inc. (ACEO) because Davis voluntarily quit his employment. Because there is sufficient evidence to support the Commission’s finding, and the finding is not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. ACEO, LLC EX REL. RPO ASSOCIATES, 334 S.W.3d 927, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 426, 2011 WL 1120021 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

334 S.W.3d 927 (Davis v. ACEO, LLC EX REL. RPO ASSOCIATES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.