Davis, Shane M. v. Harvest Party Rentals

2020 TN WC 86
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedSeptember 3, 2020
Docket2020-03-0054
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 TN WC 86 (Davis, Shane M. v. Harvest Party Rentals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis, Shane M. v. Harvest Party Rentals, 2020 TN WC 86 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

FILED Sep 03, 2020 09:11 AM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE SHANE M. DAVIS, ) Docket No. 2020-03-0054 Employee, ) v. ) State File No. 9633-2018 HARVEST PARTY RENTALS, ) Uninsured Employer. ) Judge Pamela B. Johnson

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS Decision on the Record

Shane Davis fell at work, but Harvest Party Rentals did not provide workers’ compensation benefits. Mr. Davis filed this claim seeking payment of his medical bills, additional treatment, and temporary total disability benefits. After a review of the record, the Court holds Mr. Davis is not entitled to the requested benefits at this time because he did not file medical records or other documentary evidence that satisfies his burden of proof.

History of Claim

The Court gleaned the history from the Petition for Benefit Determination, the Expedited Request for Investigation Report, and the affidavits of Mr. Davis, Mr. Hancock, and the bookkeeper. Neither party filed medical records or bills, so much is unknown on this record.

What is known and undisputed is that on September 7, 2019, Mr. Davis lost his footing while exiting the back of an equipment truck. He landed on both knees and his right wrist, and he immediately felt pain in his wrist. John Hancock, the owner of Harvest Party Rentals, told him to go to the emergency room and agreed to pay his medical bills and wages until he returned to work. Mr. Davis received emergency care and ultimately required surgery to repair his broken wrist. His treating physician was Dr. William Oros.

The parties disputed Mr. Davis’s ability to return to work. In his affidavit, Mr. Davis stated that he cannot lift or hold objects with his right hand, or perform his normal job

l duties, and therefore, he has not returned to work. In contrast, Mr. Hancock wrote in his affidavit that he paid Mr. Davis wages after the injury although he had not returned to work. Mr. Hancock further stated that he offered Mr. Davis a job answering phones, which Mr. Davis refused. Mr. Hancock stated that Mr. Davis voluntarily quit his job, which the bookkeeper confirmed.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At an Expedited Hearing, Mr. Davis must prove that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to the requested medical and temporary disability benefits. See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Turning first to medical benefits, the Workers’ Compensation Law requires an employer to provide medical and surgical treatment made reasonably necessary by a work injury. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A) (2019). Further, a work injury must arise primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment, and it must be shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14).

Here, despite the fact that the parties agree that Mr. Davis fell at work, injured his wrist, and received medical treatment, Mr. Davis did not introduce any medical records documenting his treatment or the resulting charges. Importantly, Mr. Davis did not introduce any opinion from a medical doctor that causally relates his need for treatment to the work incident and confirms that the medical treatment was reasonable and necessary. At this time, the Court holds Mr. Davis did not show that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to payment of his medical bills.

Turning to his request for ongoing treatment, the Workers’ Compensation Law additionally requires that when the employee has suffered an injury and expressed a need for medical care, the employer shall provide a panel of three physicians from which the injured employee shall select one to be the treating physician. Jd. at 50-6-204(a)(3). If an employer elects to deny a claim, it runs the risk that it will be responsible for medical benefits obtained from a provider of the employee’s choice and/or that it may be subject to penalties for failure to provide a panel and/or benefits in a timely manner. McCord, at *10.

Applying these principles, Mr. Davis was justified in seeking treatment on his own when Harvest Party Rentals did not provide a panel of physicians. However, before the Court can order Harvest Party Rentals to provide ongoing treatment, Mr. Davis must prove that the need for continuing treatment is causally related to work.

Harvest Party Rentals did not meet its obligations under the Workers’ Compensation Law. After learning of Mr. Davis’s injury, it did not provide medical benefits or a panel. Therefore, the Court refers Harvest Party Rentals to the Compliance Program for

2 investigation and assessment of a penalty for its failure to provide a panel.

In addition to medical benefits, Mr. Davis seeks temporary disability benefits. An injured employee is eligible for temporary disability benefits if: (1) the injured employee became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection exists between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the injured employee established the duration of the period of disability. Jones v. Crencor, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015).

As stated above, Mr. Davis did not introduce medical records showing he became disabled due to a work injury and the causal connection between the injury and his inability to work. Therefore, at this time, the Court holds Mr. Davis did not show that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to temporary disability benefits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows: 1. Mr. Davis’s requested benefits are denied at this time.

2. Harvest Party Rentals is referred to the Compliance Program for investigation and assessment of a penalty for its failure to provide a panel of physicians.

3. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on January 4, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The parties must call (toll-free) (855) 543-5041 to participate in the Scheduling Hearing. Failure to appear by telephone might result in a determination of the issues without the parties’ participation.

ENTERED September 3, 2020.

Pamele E. (zeae JUDGE PAMELA #/ JOHNSON Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

The Court reviewed the entire case file in reaching its decision. Specifically, the Court reviewed the following documents, marked as exhibits for ease of reference:

Exhibits: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination 2. Expedited Request for Investigation Employer’s Objection to Dispute Certification Notice Dispute Certification Notice Show Cause Order Expedited Request for Investigation Report Amended Show Cause Order Order Setting Deadline to File Request for Hearing Request for Expedited Hearing a. Employee’s List of Co-Workers b. Affidavit of Shane Davis 10. Docketing Notice for Decision on the Record 11.Employer’s Response a. Affidavit of James Hancock i. Harvest Party Rental Pay Stub b. Affidavit of Kristy Lavella i. Text Message of Shane Davis

Bo! On! [ON fom ge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this order was sent as shown on September 3, 2020.

Name U.S. Mail Email Service sent to:

Shane M. Davis, xX 406 First Street Self-Represented Seymour, TN 37865 Employee

Mary Elizabeth Maddox, x mmaddox@fmsllp.com

Employer’s Attorney

Compliance Program xX WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)
§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 TN WC 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-shane-m-v-harvest-party-rentals-tennworkcompcl-2020.