Davis Sewing Machine Co. v. Tozer

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 530
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1881·Published

Opinion

Order appealed from reversed, without costs of the appeal to either party, and motion granted allowing, the proposed amendment as to the reformation of the notes, on condition that the plaintiff, within twenty days, pay the defendant her costs and disbursements incurred in her defense since the service of the original complaint, and if such condition be not complied with, then the order is affirmed with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. Held, that the court had power to grant the motion, notwithstandstanding the statute of limitations had run upon the cause of action [531]*531sought to be introduced at the time when the motion was made. (Hatch v. The Central Nat. Bank, 78 N. Y., 487, and cases there cited by Danforth, J.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis Sewing Machine Co. v. Tozer, 30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 530 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 530 (Davis Sewing Machine Co. v. Tozer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hatch v. . Central National Bank
78 N.Y. 487 (New York Court of Appeals, 1879)