Davis (Raymond) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 80501 Appellant,
VS.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
FILED FEB 1 8 20 EL R.ROWN CLERK mE CouRV
-
BY
DEPUIY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to dismiss counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.
The court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to dismiss counsel. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provided for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
A'aJbaug , tj-Zejx60 Stiglich Silver
SUPREUE COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4010 zo-gwoi P':.tli '
ta i
cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Mueller & Associates Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A *GPO 2 ". •
41 1 11 141 'n 1r II'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis (Raymond) Vs. State (Davis (Raymond) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.