Davis (Raymond) Vs. State
This text of Davis (Raymond) Vs. State (Davis (Raymond) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, No. 80501 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED FEB 1 8 20 EL R.ROWN CLERK mE CouRV - BY DEPUIY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to dismiss counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge. The court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to dismiss counsel. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provided for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
A'aJbaug , tj-Zejx60 Stiglich Silver
SUPREUE COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4010 zo-gwoi P':.tli '
ta i cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Mueller & Associates Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A *GPO 2 ". • 41 1 11 141 'n 1r II'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis (Raymond) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-raymond-vs-state-nev-2020.