Davis-Mcgee Mule Co. v. Marett, Sheriff

123 S.E. 323, 129 S.C. 36, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 3
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 9, 1924·No. 11523·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Wilson granting a new trial in the case.

The exceptions are overruled and judgment affirmed. No appeal can be made except from a final judgment. Order granting new trial is appealable when based solely upon law. But in the instant case judgment is affirmed on grounds set forth by the Circuit Judge.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Eraser concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis-Mcgee Mule Co. v. Marett, Sheriff, 123 S.E. 323, 129 S.C. 36, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 3 (S.C. 1924).

123 S.E. 323 (Davis-Mcgee Mule Co. v. Marett, Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anita-Obong v. Tivener
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2003
Hedgepath v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
559 S.E.2d 327 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2001)
Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.
544 S.E.2d 38 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2001)
Garrett v. Snedigar
359 S.E.2d 283 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1987)
Good v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
21 S.E.2d 209 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1942)
State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Kizer
162 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)
Durant v. Bennett
54 F.2d 634 (W.D. South Carolina, 1931)
Burst v. Southern Railway Co.
159 S.E. 844 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Walker v. Quinn
133 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)