Davis Lee v. J. C. Ritsch

Fifth Circuit

Davis Lee v. J. C. Ritsch

375 F.2d 776, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6718

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 1967

Docket23716_1

StatusPublished

This text of 375 F.2d 776 (Davis Lee v. J. C. Ritsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis Lee v. J. C. Ritsch, 375 F.2d 776, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6718 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case demonstrates the difficulties encountered by a layman seeking to vindicate his rights in court without the aid of counsel. Nevertheless it also indicates the degree to which the trial court endeavored to protect the rights of the plaintiff before he finally concluded that it was necessary to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This case demonstrates the difficulties encountered by a layman seeking to vindicate his rights in court without the aid of counsel. Nevertheless it also indicates the degree to which the trial court endeavored to protect the rights of the plaintiff before he finally concluded that it was necessary to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 F.2d 776, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-lee-v-j-c-ritsch-ca5-1967.