Davis Lee v. J. C. Ritsch

Fifth Circuit

Davis Lee v. J. C. Ritsch

375 F.2d 776, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6718

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 17, 1967·No. 23716_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case demonstrates the difficulties encountered by a layman seeking to vindicate his rights in court without the aid of counsel. Nevertheless it also indicates the degree to which the trial court endeavored to protect the rights of the plaintiff before he finally concluded that it was necessary to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This case demonstrates the difficulties encountered by a layman seeking to vindicate his rights in court without the aid of counsel. Nevertheless it also indicates the degree to which the trial court endeavored to protect the rights of the plaintiff before he finally concluded that it was necessary to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. No error appearing in the record, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Davis Lee v. J. C. Ritsch, 375 F.2d 776, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6718 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

375 F.2d 776 (Davis Lee v. J. C. Ritsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.