Davis, L. v. HCR Manorcare
This text of Davis, L. v. HCR Manorcare (Davis, L. v. HCR Manorcare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J-S09005-16
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
LORRAINE L. DAVIS, EXECUTRIX OF THE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ESTATE OF: JOHN J. HUDSON, PENNSYLVANIA DECEASED
v.
HCR MANORCARE, LLC; MANOR CARE OF LANCASTER PA, LLC D/B/A MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES – LANCASTER; MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. A/K/A MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES, LLC; MANOR CARE, INC.; HCR MANORCARE, INC.; HCR IV HEALTHCARE LLC; HCR III HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCR II HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCR HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCRMC OPERATIONS, LLC; HEARTLAND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC; THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL AND LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH
APPEAL OF: HCR MANORCARE, LLC; MANOR CARE OF LANCASTER PA, LLC D/B/A MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES – LANCASTER; MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. A/K/A MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES, LLC; MANOR CARE, INC.; HCR MANORCARE, INC.; HCR IV HEALTHCARE LLC; HCR III HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCR II HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCR HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCRMC OPERATIONS, LLC; HEARTLAND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC
No. 507 MDA 2015
Appeal from the Order Entered February 25, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County Civil Division at No(s): CI-14-06658 J-S09005-16
BEFORE: PANELLA, J., LAZARUS, J., and JENKINS, J.
JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED FEBRUARY 23, 2016
Appellee, Lorraine H. Davis, as executrix for her father, John L.
Hudson’s estate, instituted the instant action against Appellant business
entities (collectively “ManorCare”), which collectively own and operate a
nursing home facility known as ManorCare Health Services – Lancaster. In
her complaint, Davis asserted causes of action for survival, wrongful death,
and punitive damages. Manorcare filed preliminary objections, seeking to
enforce an arbitration agreement it had with Hudson. On February 19,
2015,1 the trial court denied ManorCare’s preliminary objection and refused
to transfer the case to arbitration. ManorCare filed this timely, interlocutory
appeal as of right. See Gaffer Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Discover
Reinsurance Co., 936 A.2d 1109, 1110 n. 2 (Pa. Super. 2007).
ManorCare concedes that this panel is bound to affirm based upon
Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc., 113 A.3d 317 (Pa. Super.
2015), appeal granted, 122 A.3d 1036 (Pa. 2015). See Appellants’ Motion
for Summary Affirmance. They merely seek to preserve their argument
____________________________________________
1 The docket entries reflect that Rule 236 notice was given to the parties on the same date. However, the order in the certified record was stamped as docketed by the Lancaster County Prothonotary on February 25, 2015. Thus, for purposes of appeal, the date the order became appealable was February 25, 2015. See EMC Mortgage, LLC v. Biddle, 114 A.3d 1057, 1059 n.1 (Pa. Super. 2015). We have corrected the appeals statement accordingly.
-2- J-S09005-16
regarding arbitration pending the outcome of the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania’s decision in Taylor. See id.
After reviewing the briefs of the parties and the record, we agree that
Taylor controls, and therefore affirm. Manorcare’s motion for summary
affirmance is dismissed as moot.
Order affirmed. Motion for Summary affirmance dismissed as moot.
Jurisdiction relinquished.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary
Date: 2/23/2016
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis, L. v. HCR Manorcare, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-l-v-hcr-manorcare-pasuperct-2016.