Davis, K. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phl.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 25, 2016·No. 46 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

KEITH DAVIS, : No. 46 EM 2016 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

COMMON PLEAS JUDGE SANDY L.V. : BYRD, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth

v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to

strike the name of the jurist of the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis, K. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phl., (Pa. 2016).

Davis, K. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phl. (Davis, K. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phl.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)