Davis, K. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phl.
This text of Davis, K. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phl. (Davis, K. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phl.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
KEITH DAVIS, : No. 46 EM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COMMON PLEAS JUDGE SANDY L.V. : BYRD, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth
v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to
strike the name of the jurist of the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis, K. v. Ct. of Com. Pleas Phl., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-k-v-ct-of-com-pleas-phl-pa-2016.