Davis, Johnny Eugene Sr.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 13, 2015·No. PD-0128-15·Published

Opinion

PD-0128-15 RECEIVED IN 40 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FILED IN ffl 13 2015 COUFT Ul-CRIMINAL APPEALS i APR 13 2015 (Pause in proceedings . ) jkftAl 2 THE COURT: Anything further, Ms. Massey? Abel Acosta, Clerk 3 MS. MASSEY: Not from the State, Your

4 Honor

5 THE COURT: Anything further, Mr. Ritchie?

6 MR. RITCHIE: None from the Defense, Your

7 Honor.

• THE COURT: I'm slightly perplexed about

why this occurred. I mean, a person of average

intelligence or even diminished intelligence should know

better than to do this. And there's an indication in

Exhibit 2 that you always did that. So it was not an

isolated incident.

Ms. Massey, do you have any closing

arguments you'd like to make?

MS. MASSEY: Yes, Your Honor.

17 Based on the severity of this case, the

••te.fact that it's not an isolated incident, and his

* explosive personality disorder that he admits that he has, that he does have tendencies towards anger and

interest of the community that he be sentenced to the

Institutional Division of TDCJ.

But if the Court chooses not to do that,

we would ask that he be at least required to do an anger

/ ELIZABETH BOURQUIN, CSR /" ^ 29TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PALO PINTO COUNTY, TEXAS 41

1 management class and not be near his wife or child, if

2 that's what they ask, and it's my understanding they

3 have asked, for at least two years.

4 THE COURT: Well, let me just ask you

5 that. I mean, that's -- can that be imposed -- you're

6 saying that can be imposed as a term and condition of

7 probation?

8 MS. MASSEY: It can be a condition of

9 probation that he not be near his wife and child for as

10 long as the Court deems proper.

11 THE COURT: But that would not be

12 enforceable like a protective order would be, though.

13 MS. MASSEY: No. It would be a violation

14 of probation if he did that.

15 THE COURT: All right.

16 MS. MASSEY: This would just be extra

17 protection for the family.

18 THE COURT: Right. Okay.

19 All right. Can you speak to the mindset

20 of this offense, though, that I was alluding to? Why

21 would this occur? I mean, based upon — what's your

22 position in that regard?

23 MS. MASSEY: Based on the evidence, the ***" /2 4 only conclusion" that I can come up with is that he was »?^ 2*5 angry with the child for whatever reason, whether it was -"-'.. y*rj;. £ - ,i_o: ;'-.^J^

" ELIZABETH BOURQUIN, CSR 29TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PALO PINTO COUNTY, TEXAS /\j-'~eAj &JS *% -*S \J ^ •"• »•'• .} 1$ € ^ \ O-0MC&- -• •&>

*k r •4 4 V;- ;•!•' "j «^f* 00-e,S aj^T SM-O iX>i +!• A4 f /w7T 0 ^'•mL. 7 si

(.*C /because he dirtied his diaper or__because he wasn't being *2 ) still —

3 THE COURT: Okay.

4 MS. MASSEY: -- and did this out of anger.

5 THE COURT: Okay.

6 All right, Mr. Ritchie.

7 MR. RITCHIE: My take on the actual

8 incident is -- give me a second to articulate what I

9 really think about what the evidence shows, Judge', is 10 that when you first look at it in a vacuum, it's — you

11 think, well, who would do that conduct?

12 But then you go, how can a three-year-old

13 having a diaper changed and wiggling around and. doing

14 certain things? I mean, it's just — you go, wow, how

15 can that happen?

"Ttr I think you get into inadvertence; I think

17 you get to recklessness, which is also part of that S 18 statute. And, you know, there's a 1esser*. incTud^gd^gc^irig^ II 19 down. That's a state jail felony offense. But — andi | J20 don't think that's what the Court is asking about.

I21 But I don't — to me, ,,t'his evidence is"""% i 122 that Johnny did not do it.a nume:rous number of times or v

23 probably the same result would have happened because of ^ ""•to'JSg&S ^-^•sp—"-?^^~~^?'Ktt&v$&rj-,—^tr??""*^ j •- r" ^< ^-'j5^^-«^r^^-s:rr-:'"~"""'*" "^s"T7*'

Athe finqernails or whatever^*) But I think it was a — it 24 I 1 25 happened spur of the minute A :-^-s-—.;jV^:-^>- Vf; The child's wiggling .^r^esOT!''"'?8^^*^^

ELIZABETH BOURQUIN, CSR 29TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PALO PINTO COUNTY, TEXAS 43

; l around, going around, maybe not behaving.

I And so, Judge, it is what it is. I think 1

3 3 your perception is the same as everybody else's. But I

think the practicalities of this happening in the -- in the near future are just -- I mean, I don't think "" i'5 there's any threat to society about Johnny going around changing diapers on kids, okay, number one.

•—— ' "I^niean, it's -- the kid is bound to be old 9 enough, since he's going to be five, where the same kind

10 of conduct wouldn't occur. Maybe other conduct would 11 occur. I mean, that's always a concern for us. But

12 that conduct can't '-- surely wouldn't.

13 I don't know -- I honestly don't know

14 where the CPS case is in this system. I'm assuming -- 15 and the Court may know -- if it's in this court, then it

16 certainly would be supervised visitation, and he

17 wouldn't have the opportunity to be around the kid, kind

18 of like a protective order, without supervision. And I

19 don't know that.

20 THE COURT: I don't know — I don't know

21 the answer. I have so many of them I can't --

22 MR-. RITCHIE: I understand, Judge. And

23 I -- but I would -- we both know -- CPS is in it

24 somewhere, I believe.

25 And as a condition of probation, I

ELIZABETH BOURQUIN, CSR 29TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PALO PINTO COUNTY, TEXAS jfS^^yor $ko^ tu,k£ bj *LjN.(> C,A,JJ^ >J'h 44

;f^ '^

1 would -- I would think that this Court could just make 2 it an order of the Court for him not to be around, until 3 further order, and let him amend his conditions of

4 probation through a lawyer, if the Court felt 5 comfortable about that. And certainly, anger management 6 and those kind of things.

7 But I don't think Johnny is a threat to

8 society. I think he's genuinely concerned about the ...-^sz^taM'SBii&i ^,,^,.^111 iiilir<1f'^*,a''l*J'**!^-'*'^^',***iaiWllr*rt'llTITtHTWi'j-irTrfrTf*Tr*rH6'*rHWmTrV1* •"W*-"¥r*'.fVi'|-

11 is a -- I don't think the evidence shows that this is a '•gSSBSPW!®*****'**9^^ 12 violent predator like that. „

13 I think it was a total lapse of judgment, 14 to even attempt to change a diaper that way. I mean, I

15 thinkr 4-k,4- that's I n -- 4-1 J-l-J that's true ^^BSSKsisi^21- 16 THE COURT: Well, I mean, the pictures are

17 very serious to me. I mean they depict very serious 18

19 MR. RITCHIE: Yes, sir.

20 THE COURT: Almost shocking of the

21 conscience really is the way I see it. And I just --

22 that's why I say, I just don't understand how a human

23 being can do that to their own son. That's really

24 troubling to me.

25 MS. MASSEY: Your Honor, actually, his

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI