DAVIS, JENNIFER S. v. DRIGGS, ROBERT P.

106 A.D.3d 1525, 964 N.Y.S.2d 446
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 3, 2013
DocketCAF 12-00306
StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.3d 1525 (DAVIS, JENNIFER S. v. DRIGGS, ROBERT P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DAVIS, JENNIFER S. v. DRIGGS, ROBERT P., 106 A.D.3d 1525, 964 N.Y.S.2d 446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered February 7, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order, inter alia, confirmed the determination of the Support Magistrate that respondent willfully failed to obey a court order.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order confirming the determination of the Support Magistrate that he willfully disobeyed an order to pay child support. We agree with Family Court that the father failed to present “some competent, credible evidence of his inability to make the required payments” and thus failed to rebut the presumption of a willful violation (Matter of Powers v Powers, 86 NY2d 63, 70 [1995]). We reject the father’s contention that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel based on his attorney’s failure to present evidence in admissible form rebutting the presumption. Viewed in its totality, the representation received by the father was meaningful, and we note that he did not suffer any actual prejudice as a result of the claimed deficiency (see Matter of Kemp v Kemp, 19 AD3d 748, 751 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 707 [2005]). Although the father’s attorney had difficulty before the Support Magistrate in introducing admissible evidence regarding the father’s alleged disability and, indeed, none of the medical records introduced by the father’s attorney was admitted in evidence by the Support Magistrate, the record establishes that *1526 the court itself considered those documents and admitted them in evidence during its consideration of the penalty to be imposed. Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Garni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers
653 N.E.2d 1154 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Kemp v. Kemp
19 A.D.3d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A.D.3d 1525, 964 N.Y.S.2d 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-jennifer-s-v-driggs-robert-p-nyappdiv-2013.