Davis, James Howard

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 22, 2012
DocketWR-78,158-01
StatusPublished

This text of Davis, James Howard (Davis, James Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis, James Howard, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-78,158-01
EX PARTE JAMES HOWARD DAVIS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 09-0093X IN THE 71ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRISON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and sentenced to eight years, which was probated. His probation was later revoked, and he was sentenced to four years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that from July 29, 2009 to March 1, 2010, he completed a treatment program at a substance abuse felony punishment facility operated by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. He contends, however, that he was not credited with this time. In its response, the State contends that Article 42.03, § 2(a)(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which Applicant relies on, applies to persons placed on deferred adjudication probation, not to persons whose sentences have been probated. We dismiss this application. The appropriate remedy is a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc and, if the trial court does not respond, an application for a writ of mandamus. Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). In dismissing this application, we note that persons whose sentences are probated may be entitled to pre-sentence credit for time spent in a substance abuse felony punishment facility. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12, § 23(b).

Filed: August 22, 2012

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Ybarra
149 S.W.3d 147 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davis, James Howard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-james-howard-texcrimapp-2012.