Davis, Holmes & Davis v. Schermerhorn
5 How. Pr. 440
Opinion
Ordered that such amendment be made, and the name of Holmes be struck out, on paying $10 costs of this motion, and on giving security, by a bond to be approved by the county judge of Rensselaer county, to pay, in case the defendant recover judgment in this action, thatportion of the defendant’s costs which had accrued previous to the time of making this motion,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis, Holmes & Davis v. Schermerhorn, 5 How. Pr. 440 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1850).
5 How. Pr. 440 (Davis, Holmes & Davis v. Schermerhorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Comerford v. Fahy Market
204 A.D. 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)