Davis, Germain Lawon

CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 12, 2015
DocketPD-1335-15
StatusPublished

This text of Davis, Germain Lawon (Davis, Germain Lawon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis, Germain Lawon, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

PD-1335-15 PD-1335-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/12/2015 12:00:00 AM Accepted 10/12/2015 5:18:10 PM ABEL ACOSTA NO. 01-13-00947-CR CLERK

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

FROM THE FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

GERMAIN LAWON DAVIS, APPELLANT

VS.

STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TERRENCE GAISER LAWYER FOR APPELLANT 2900 SMITH STREET, # 220 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006 October 12, 2015 SBOT# 07572500 713/ 225-0666 tagaiser@aol.com NO. 1330760

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § VS. § HARRIS COUNTY,TEXAS § GERMAIN LAWON DAVIS § 182ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

NOW COMES GERMAIN DAVIS, appellant in the above-captioned

cause, by and through his attorney, TERRENCE GAISER, and files his

Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to File Appellant’s Petition for

Discretionary Review; for which he would show:

1.) Appellant appeals from a judgment of guilt and sentence of life without

parole the offense of capital murder

2.) On September 24, 2015, a panel of the First Court of Appeals in Cause

No. 01-13-00947-CR, Germain Lawon Davis v. State of Texas, issued a

memorandum opinion affirming appellant’s conviction. No motion for

rehearing was filed.. Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is due

on Monday, October 26, 2015. This is the first requested extension.

Appellant requests a thirty-day extension to and including November 26,

2015.

3.) This extension is being sought for the following reasons: After fter careful review of the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the

transcript of this case, in counsel’s professional opinion, further review of

this case would be frivolous and without further merit. Counsel has

informed appellant of his right to seek discretionary review, pro se, and will

inform appellant of this request for extension.

4.) Counsel will file a motion to withdraw as attorney of record in the First

Court of Appeals and will inform appellant, by copy of that motion.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, appellant prays for an extension

of time to file appellant’s petition for discretionary review to and including

October 26, 2015.

Respectfully Submitted,

/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser TERRENCE GAISER LAWYER FOR APPELLANT 2900 SMITH STREET, STE. 220 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006 (713) 225-0666 SBN# 07572500 tagaiser@aol.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE A PDR WAS SERVED ON ALL PARTIES ACCORDING TO THE RULES.

/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser TERRENCE GAISER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davis, Germain Lawon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-germain-lawon-tex-2015.