Davis ex rel. J.F.D. v. Shekita

Fourth Circuit

Davis ex rel. J.F.D. v. Shekita

667 F. App'x 422

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2016·No. No. 16-1526·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying eight motions in a closed civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Shekita, No. 5:12-cv-00504-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying eight motions in a closed civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Shekita, No. 5:12-cv-00504-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Davis ex rel. J.F.D. v. Shekita, 667 F. App'x 422 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 422 (Davis ex rel. J.F.D. v. Shekita) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.