Davis ex rel. J.F.D. v. Shekita

Fourth Circuit

Davis ex rel. J.F.D. v. Shekita

667 F. App'x 422

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 2016

DocketNo. 16-1526

StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 422 (Davis ex rel. J.F.D. v. Shekita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis ex rel. J.F.D. v. Shekita, 667 F. App'x 422 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying eight motions in a closed civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Shekita, No. 5:12-cv-00504-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying eight motions in a closed civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Shekita, No. 5:12-cv-00504-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 F. App'x 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-ex-rel-jfd-v-shekita-ca4-2016.