Davis, Eric Jermond v. State
Opinion
Order entered June 18, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01323-CR No. 05-12-01349-CR
ERIC JERMOND DAVIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-71411-W, F11-59063-W
ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeals.
The records in these cases reflect that appellant was sentenced on July 25, 2012.
Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, entitled “motion to appeal,” on August 24, 2012. The
trial court certified appellant has the right to appeal. The trial court appointed the Dallas County
Public Defender’s Office to represent appellant in the appeals. The clerk’s and reporter’s records
have been filed. This Court has twice ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why
appellant’s brief, which is nearly six months overdue, has not been filed. To date, the trial court
has neither filed the findings nor responded to any of the letters this Court has sent regarding the
status of those findings. Additionally, we have had no correspondence from the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office regarding appellant’s brief in these appeals. The appeals cannot
proceed until the issue of appellant’s brief is resolved.
Accordingly, we ORDER the Honorable Tracy Holmes, Presiding Judge of the 363rd
Judicial District Court, to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been
filed. In this regard, the Honorable Tracy Holmes shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether
appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the Honorable Tracy Holmes cannot obtain appellant’s presence at
the hearing, the Honorable Tracy Holmes shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See
Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If
appellant is indigent, the Honorable Tracy Holmes is ORDERED to take such measures as may
be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the Honorable Tracy Holmes to transmit a record of the proceedings, which
shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court by JULY 5, 2013.
FAILURE OF THE HONORABLE TRACY HOLMES, PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE 363rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, TO FILE THE FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING APPELLANT’S BRIEF BY THE DATE HEREIN SET FORTH MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND/OR A JUDGMENT OF CONTEMPT.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the
Honorable Tracy Holmes, Presiding Judge, 363rd Judicial District Court, Katherine Drew,
Appellate-Chief, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office, and Michael Casillas, Appellate-
Chief, Dallas County District Attorney’s Office. The appeals are ABATED to allow the Honorable Tracy Holmes to comply with the
above order. The appeals shall be reinstated on July 15, 2013 or when the findings are received,
whichever is earlier.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis, Eric Jermond v. State (Davis, Eric Jermond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.