Davis Construction Corp. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis Construction Corp. v. State

42 A.D.2d 655, 345 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1973

DocketClaim No. 53297

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 655 (Davis Construction Corp. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis Construction Corp. v. State, 42 A.D.2d 655, 345 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims denying claimant’s motion to file an amended appraisal pursuant to rule 1200.27 [656]*656of the Court of Claims (22 NYCRR 1200.27). Motions such as the instant one are to be granted only where unusual and substantial circumstances are shown (Farrington v. State of New York, 33 A D 2d 731, mot. for iv. to opp. dsmd. 27 N Y 2d 531; of. Nome Gas Co. v. Miles, 40 A D 2d 896; Elmira Urban Renewal Agency v. Volunteers of Amer., 39 A D 2d 991), and we find no basis presented here to disturb the discretion of the Court of Claims in denying the instant motion (Laken Realty Corp. v. State of New York, 37 A D 2d 885; Farrington v. State of New York, supra). Order affirmed, with costs. Staley, Jr., J. P., Greenblott, Cooke, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims denying claimant’s motion to file an amended appraisal pursuant to rule 1200.27 [656]*656of the Court of Claims (22 NYCRR 1200.27). Motions such as the instant one are to be granted only where unusual and substantial circumstances are shown (Farrington v. State of New York, 33 A D 2d 731, mot. for iv. to opp. dsmd. 27 N Y 2d 531; of. Nome Gas Co. v. Miles, 40 A D 2d 896; Elmira Urban Renewal Agency v. Volunteers of Amer., 39 A D 2d 991), and we find no basis presented here to disturb the discretion of the Court of Claims in denying the instant motion (Laken Realty Corp. v. State of New York, 37 A D 2d 885; Farrington v. State of New York, supra). Order affirmed, with costs. Staley, Jr., J. P., Greenblott, Cooke, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 655, 345 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-construction-corp-v-state-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack