Davis Construction Co. v. Albany Produce Co.

119 S.E. 459, 31 Ga. App. 72, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 729
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 11, 1923·No. 14309·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bell, J.

Where the sole defect in a chattel mortgage fi. fa. is the fact that the mortgage was foreclosed in the wrong county, advantage thereof can be taken by a claimant of the property levied upon only by objecting to the admission of the fi. fa. in evidence, or by a motion to dismiss the levy. Where the claimant does neither, and upon the trial of the claim case a verdict is directed for the plaintiff in fi. fa. upon evidence showing, without dispute, that the property is subject to the lien of the mortgage, the verdict should not be set aside merely because of the defect in the fi. fa. Bosworth v. Clark, 62 Ga. 287 (1); Morton v. Gahona, 70 Ga. 569 (1); Dixon v. Williams, 82 Ga. 105 (1) (9 S. E. 468); Gazan v. Royce, 78 Ga. 512 (1) (3 S. E. 753); Osborne v. Rice, 107 Ga. 281 (2) (33 S. E. 54); Morrison v. McRae, 111 Ga. 847 (36 S. E. 462); Carreker v. Thornton, 1 Ga. App. 508, 511 (57 S. E. 988); Rossiter Co. v. Carrollton Electric Light Co., 5 Ga. App. 393 (1) (63 S. E. 233). The claimant’s motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis Construction Co. v. Albany Produce Co., 119 S.E. 459, 31 Ga. App. 72, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 729 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

119 S.E. 459 (Davis Construction Co. v. Albany Produce Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

George Washington Life Insurance v. Peacock
82 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)