Davis, Alvin Jerome Ii
This text of Davis, Alvin Jerome Ii (Davis, Alvin Jerome Ii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-94,040-02
EX PARTE ALVIN JEROME DAVIS, II., Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 16CR19860A IN THE 123RD DISTRICT COURT FROM SHELBY COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to assault family violence. Applicant was originally placed on
deferred adjudication community supervision for a period of five years. Following adjudication,
Applicant was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant filed this application for writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district
clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because he was not properly admonished
on the applicable punishment range, and he was not provided an opportunity to withdraw his original
plea upon discovery of the error. Applicant also contends that he was denied due process when one
of the prosecutors previously represented him in the same case. Applicant has alleged facts that, if 2
true, might entitle him to relief. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970); Ex parte Spain, 589
S.W.2d 132, 134 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial
court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The
trial court shall order trial counsel and adjudication counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In
developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial
court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is
indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him
at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial
court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel
was ineffective for failing to correctly advise Applicant as to the proper punishment range, whether
adjudication counsel was ineffective for failing to advise Applicant of the possibility of withdrawing
his plea, and whether Applicant’s plea was involuntary. The trial court shall also make findings of
fact and conclusions of law as to whether the prosecutor’s prior representation of Applicant violated
Applicant’s due process rights upon adjudication. The trial court may make any other findings and
conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 28, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis, Alvin Jerome Ii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-alvin-jerome-ii-texcrimapp-2022.