Davios v. Arthur Knorr Express

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davios v. Arthur Knorr Express

20 A.D.2d 777, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4207

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 777 (Davios v. Arthur Knorr Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davios v. Arthur Knorr Express, 20 A.D.2d 777, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff stipulates to accept $20,000 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendants-appellants. In this personal injury negligence action it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive in the award for damages and that a verdict in excess of $20,000 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff stipulates to accept $20,000 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendants-appellants. In this personal injury negligence action it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive in the award for damages and that a verdict in excess of $20,000 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 777, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davios-v-arthur-knorr-express-nyappdiv-1964.