DAVINROY v. Treasurer of Missouri
This text of 268 S.W.3d 454 (DAVINROY v. Treasurer of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Robert Davinroy (Claimant) appeals the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying his claim for compensation against the Second Injury Fund. The Commission concluded that Claimant failed to meet his burden of proving that the claimed injury to his left knee was causally connected to his employment. Claimant claims that the Commission erred when it failed to find that his claimed injury was causally related to his work because the ALJ arbitrarily disregarded uncontradicted and unim-peached expert testimony and based his decision on his own personal opinion. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the Commission’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 S.W.3d 454, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1600, 2008 WL 4710788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davinroy-v-treasurer-of-missouri-moctapp-2008.