Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Davila v. United Fruit Co.

Davila v. United Fruit Co.

103 A. 519, 88 N.J. Eq. 602, 3 Stock. 602, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 313
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 31, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 103 A. 519 (Davila v. United Fruit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davila v. United Fruit Co., 103 A. 519, 88 N.J. Eq. 602, 3 Stock. 602, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 313 (N.J. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

[608]*608For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams — 11. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keppler v. Terhune
212 A.2d 683 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Sommer v. Mackay
160 A. 495 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932)
Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettibone Cataract Paper Co.
112 Misc. 528 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A. 519, 88 N.J. Eq. 602, 3 Stock. 602, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davila-v-united-fruit-co-nj-1918.