Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Davila v. United Fruit Co.

Davila v. United Fruit Co.

103 A. 519, 88 N.J. Eq. 602, 3 Stock. 602, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 313
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1918·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

[608]*608For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams — 11. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davila v. United Fruit Co., 103 A. 519, 88 N.J. Eq. 602, 3 Stock. 602, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 313 (N.J. 1918).

103 A. 519 (Davila v. United Fruit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keppler v. Terhune
212 A.2d 683 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Sommer v. Mackay
160 A. 495 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932)
Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettibone Cataract Paper Co.
112 Misc. 528 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)