Davila, Louis Angelo
This text of Davila, Louis Angelo (Davila, Louis Angelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,030-01
EX PARTE LOUIS ANGELO DAVILA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 08-01-0031-CRA-A IN THE 81ST DISTRICT COURT FROM ATASCOSA COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant originally pleaded guilty to
aggravated assault in exchange for deferred adjudication community supervision. His guilt was later
adjudicated and he was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment.
Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal after adjudication because
adjudication counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the
trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. 2
The trial court finds that adjudication counsel file a motion to withdraw from the
representation so that appellate counsel could be appointed, but that the motion was never brought
to the attention of the trial court. The trial court finds that Applicant was denied his right to appeal
due to a failure of the system. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-
time appeal of the judgment adjudicating guilt in Cause No. 08-01-0031-CRA from the 81st District
Court of Atascosa County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written
notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within
ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately
appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if
the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that,
should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice
of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.
Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1997).
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: September 14, 2016 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davila, Louis Angelo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davila-louis-angelo-texcrimapp-2016.