Davila, Evodia v. Diversified Builders, Inc.

2016 TN WC 217
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedSeptember 26, 2016
Docket2015-08-0465
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 TN WC 217 (Davila, Evodia v. Diversified Builders, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davila, Evodia v. Diversified Builders, Inc., 2016 TN WC 217 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2016).

Opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS

Evodio Davila, ) Docket No.: 2015-08-0465 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 29117-2015 Diversified Builders, Inc., ) Employer, ) Judge: Jim Umsted And ) Builders Mutual Insurance, ) Insurance Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUESTED BENEFITS

This case came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on September 20, 2016, upon the Request for Expedited Hearing filed by the employee, Evodio Davila, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239 (2015). The present focus of this case is whether the employer, Diversified Builders, Inc., must provide additional medical and temporary disability benefits for Mr. Davila's alleged work-related injuries. The central legal issue is whether Mr. Davila can demonstrate a likelihood of success at a trial on the merits on these issues. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds Mr. Davila is unlikely to succeed at a hearing on the merits in proving entitlement to the requested benefits. 1

History of Claim

The following facts were established at the Expedited Hearing. Mr. Davila is a forty-six-year-old resident of Shelby County, Tennessee. He claimed he sustained multiple injuries after falling from a walk board while working for Diversified Builders on April9, 2015.

After the accident, Diversified Builders provided Mr. Davila with a panel of physicians from which he selected D.r. Nahum Beard from Campbell's Clinic as his

1 A complete listing of the technical record and exhibits is attached to this Order as an appendix.

1 treating physician. Dr. Beard oversaw medical care for Mr. Davila's left knee injury, treating the knee conservatively with physical therapy and medication. However, he referred Mr. Davila to specialists for his other injuries, which included a head injury and left shoulder injury, among others.

In a prior Expedited Hearing Order issued on May 10, 2016, this Court required Mr. Davila to provide a list of his medical providers for the previous ten years to Diversified Builders so it could obtain a complete set of medical records to supply to Dr. Beard. It also ordered Diversified Builders to schedule an appointment with Dr. Beard to examine Mr. Davila, review all relevant medical records, and treat injuries he found compensable. Thereafter, Diversified Builders scheduled a follow-up appointment for Mr. Davila with Dr. Beard, and Dr. Beard ordered a series of injections for Mr. Davila's left knee. On July 21, 2016, Mr. Davila was scheduled for the third injection in the series, but he had a family emergency arise that required him to leave the country prior to his appointment. Due to Mr. Davila's failure to attend the appointment, Diversified Builders stopped his benefits, citing medical non-compliance. 2 Mr. Davila filed a new Request for Expedited Hearing on August 12, 2016, based on this termination of his benefits.

Immediately prior to the Expedited Hearing held on September 20, 2016, the Court heard Mr. Davila's Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Pay Weekly Compensation and Creating Undue Delay of Proceedings 3 as well as Diversified Builders' Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Order. Mr. Davila asked for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 United States Code section 1927, arguing that Diversified Builders was causing undue delay in the proceedings through its filings and discovery. Diversified Builders sought sanctions for Mr. Davila's failure to provide a complete list of medical providers per the Court's May 10, 2016 order. The Court took both of these motions under advisement.

During the hearing, Mr. Davila specifically requested the Court to order Diversified Builders to pay ongoing temporary disability benefits from July 21, 2016. He also asked the Court to require Diversified Builders to pay the medical bills associated with an unauthorized visit to St. Francis Hospital on June 1, 2016. He claimed this visit related to his April 9, 2015 fall because he developed a rash down his left leg after his authorized physical therapist put black tape on his leg to stabilize his knee.

2 Diversified Builders reinstated Mr. Davila's benefits upon his return to Dr. Beard for the third injection in August 2016. However, the parties submitted no medical records to show the exact date Mr. Davila returned to Dr. Beard for treatment. 3 The Court also heard Mr. Davila's Motion to Determine Compensability of Medical Treatment, which the Court determined should be decided as part of the Expedited Hearing. It involved unauthorized medical treatment Mr. Davila obtained at St. Francis Hospital on June I, 2016.

2 Diversified Builders argued it has paid for all authorized treatment recommended by Dr. Beard and has reinstated Mr. Davila's temporary disability benefits. It further contended Mr. Davila offered no medical proof that his June 1, 2016 treatment for cellulitis at St. Francis Hospital causally related to his work injury of April 9, 2015.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

General Legal Principles

At an Expedited Hearing, Mr. Davila need not prove every element of his claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to recover temporary disability and/or medical benefits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). Instead, he must come forward with sufficient evidence from which this Court can determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. !d.; Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2015). This lesser evidentiary standard "does not relieve an employee of the burden of producing evidence of an injury by accident that arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment at an expedited hearing, but allows some relief to be granted if that evidence does not rise to the level of a 'preponderance of the evidence."' Buchanan v. Carlex Glass Co., No. 2015-01-0012, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Sept. 29, 2015). In analyzing whether he has met his burden, the Court will not remedially or liberally construe the law in his favor, but instead shall construe the law fairly, impartially, and in accordance with basic principles of statutory construction favoring neither Mr. Davila nor Diversified Builders. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-116 (2015).

Mr. Davila's Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Pay Weekly Compensation and Creating Undue Delay ofProceedings

Based on the statements of counsel and the evidence presented, the Court holds Diversified Builders did not fail to pay weekly compensation or create an undue delay of the proceedings. Therefore, the Court denies Mr. Davila's motion for sanctions.

Diversified Builders' Motion for Sanctions for Mr. Davila's Failure to Provide a Complete List of Medical Providers (per the Court's May 10, 2016 order)

Based on the statements of counsel and the evidence presented, the Court holds Mr. Davila and his counsel made a good faith effort to comply with the Court's prior order. The Court believes Mr. Davila's testimony where he stated he provided a list of all the medical providers he could remember. He admitted he may not remember all of his past physicians, but he believes he listed most of them. Therefore, the Court denies Diversified Builders' request for sanctions.

3 Medical Benefits

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lon Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Company
274 S.W.3d 638 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2008)
Simpson v. Satterfield
564 S.W.2d 953 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 TN WC 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davila-evodia-v-diversified-builders-inc-tennworkcompcl-2016.