Davila, Danielle
This text of Davila, Danielle (Davila, Danielle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,636-01
EX PARTE DANIELLE DAVILA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 15-1104-CR-A-A IN THE 25TH DISTRICT COURT FROM GUADALUPE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced to six
years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of
conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that she is being denied due process in the parole revocation process.
Applicant alleges that while out on parole she was arrested for a new misdemeanor charge, but no
information or indictment has been filed. A parole revocation warrant was issued and executed, but
Applicant has been held for more than 41 days without a parole revocation hearing and without being
formally charged with the new offense. Applicant alleges that she did not waive her right to a
revocation hearing. 2
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. TEX . GOV ’T CODE Sec.
508.282; Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S 471, 488, 92 S. Ct. 2593, 33 L. Ed. 2d 484 (1972).
Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings
of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with
knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in
Article 11.07, § 3(d). It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to
hold a hearing, it shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether
Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court
shall appoint counsel to represent her at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant has been advised of his
rights in the revocation process, whether she requested or has received a preliminary hearing, and
whether she has received a final revocation hearing. The trial court shall make findings of fact as
to whether Applicant was arrested for a new offense, and if so, whether she has been formally
charged with a new offense. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as
to whether Applicant is being afforded due process in the parole revocation process. The trial court
may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s
claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, 3
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 16, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davila, Danielle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davila-danielle-texcrimapp-2020.