Davignon v. Hodgson

524 F.3d 91
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davignon v. Hodgson. Read the opinion of the Court — 524 F.3d 91
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 20, 2008·No. 06-1191·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 06-1191

DAVID DAVIGNON, DAVID GOUVEIA, DAVID MILLER, EDWARD MORIS, JR., and THOMAS PRESBY,

Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v.

THOMAS M. HODGSON, Individually and as Bristol County Sheriff,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 24, 2008 is amended as follows:

Page 14, lines 11-12: the citation to Mt. Healthy City Sch.

Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 281-282 (1977) is deleted.

Page 28, line 11: the following sentence is inserted as part of the quoted language, following 'decision.': "Of course, the employer must have the opportunity to prove that it would have made the same decision regardless of the protected expression."

Page 28, line 15: "thus" is inserted between 'is' and 'ordinarily'.

Page 29, line 8: The citation to Id. is amended to read "Curran, 509 F.3d at 45; O'Connor, 994 F.2d at 913."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davignon v. Hodgson, 524 F.3d 91 (1st Cir. 2008).

524 F.3d 91 (Davignon v. Hodgson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related