Davies v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Davies v. State

107 So. 3d 1224, 2013 WL 645625, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2942

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 22, 2013

DocketNo. 5D11-4227

StatusPublished

This text of 107 So. 3d 1224 (Davies v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davies v. State, 107 So. 3d 1224, 2013 WL 645625, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2942 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, convicted in 1986 of first-degree murder, is now appealing from a 2010 denial of habeas corpus and a motion for clarification. Defendant alleges ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, as well as from counsel consulted but not retained. Defendant alleges that his late filing should be excused under the holding of Steele v. Kekoe, 747 So.2d 931 (Fla.1999). Unlike Kehoe, however, defendant never retained counsel and therefore relied on none.

This is not the first time these matters have been considered by this Court. On [1225]*1225August 12, 2012, this Court, by order, denied defendant’s petition raising ineffective assistance of counsel and on March 6, 1012, by per curiam affirmance, denied his request for habeas relief.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, LAWSON, JJ„ and HARRIS, C.M., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI