Davies v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided August 9, 2021·No. 18-502·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Cited States Court of Federal Clanns

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No.18-502V Filed: July 13, 2021

*K * * * * OR * OR * OR * OO BRIANNA DAVIES, * UNPUBLISHED *K Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation; * Uveitis; Human Papillomavirus V. * (“HPV”) Vaccine. *K SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, ** *K Respondent. ** *K * * * * OR * OR * OR * OO

Meredith Daniels, Esg., Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Colleen Hartley, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION!

Roth, Special Master:

On April 5, 2018, Brianna Davies [“Ms. Davies” or “petitioner”? filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.? Petitioner alleges that she suffered from uveitis after receiving a human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccine on April 11,

' Although this Decision has been fomnally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certam kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 1 8(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) thatis a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. /d.

* The matter was originally filed by petitioner’s parents, Matthew Davies and Joan Davies, as Brianna Davies was a minor. During the pendency of this case, Brianna Da vies reached theage of majority and was properly substituted as petitioner.

3 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). 2016. Stipulation filed July 13, 2021, at {{[ 1-4. Respondent denies that the immunization caused petitioner’s injury. Stipulation at { 6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On July 13, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payments:

A lump sum of $97,975.40 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Brianna Davies; this sum represents $95,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,975.40 for first year life care expenses.

A lump sum of $6,994.21, in the form of check payable jointly to petitioner and her parents, Matthew and Joan Davies, to be endorsed to Matthew and Joan Davies; this sum represents past unreimbursable expenses.

An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of the signed Stipulation, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased.

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.*

IT ISSO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

* Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) BRIANNA DAVIES, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) No. 18-502V SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) Special Master Roth AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ECF ) Respondent. ) ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Brianna Davies, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”).! The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received her vaccination on April 11, 2016.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered from uveitis as a result of receiving the vaccine, and that she experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

6. Respondent denies that the vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from uveitis or any

' This matter was originally filed by Matthew Davies and Joan Davies, parents of Brianna Davies, a minor. During the pendency of this case, Briana Davies reached the age of majority and she was properly substituted as petitioner. other injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments:

U.S.C.

a. A lump sum of $97,975.40, which amount represents compensation for first year life care expenses ($2,975.40), and pain and suffering ($95,000.00) in the form of a check payable to petitioner;

b. A lump sum payment of $6,994.21, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner, and her

parents, Matthew Davies and Joan Davies. Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to Matthew Davies and Joan Davies; and

c. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 below, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42

§300aa-15(a).

9. The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and

surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company

must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:

a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, At+g, At+p, Att, or Ats; b. Moody’s Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aal, or Aaa;

c. Standard and Poor’s Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA; d.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davies v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Davies v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Davies v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a