Davies v. Maroc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davies v. Maroc

291 A.D.2d 343, 739 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 343 (Davies v. Maroc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davies v. Maroc, 291 A.D.2d 343, 739 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 16, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor upon her claim for gender discrimination, awarded plaintiff damages for economic and emotional harm in the total sum of $903,017, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court properly declined plaintiff-appellant’s request to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury. Defendant’s offending conduct, as demonstrated at trial, while highly inappropriate, did not warrant an award of punitive damages (see, generally, Kolstad v American Dental Assn., 527 US 526, 538-539).

The points defendant raised on its cross appeal are unavailing. The verdict as to liability was sufficiently supported by, and was not against the weight of, the evidence (see, Matter of Classic Coach v Mercado, 280 AD2d 164, lv denied 97 NY2d 601). The trial court’s rulings did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The jury’s award to plaintiff of $500,000 for emotional distress did not, under the circumstances presented, materially deviate from what is reasonable compensation. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 16, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor upon her claim for gender discrimination, awarded plaintiff damages for economic and emotional harm in the total sum of $903,017, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court properly declined plaintiff-appellant’s request to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury. Defendant’s offending conduct, as demonstrated at trial, while highly inappropriate, did not warrant an award of punitive damages (see, generally, Kolstad v American Dental Assn., 527 US 526, 538-539).

The points defendant raised on its cross appeal are unavailing. The verdict as to liability was sufficiently supported by, and was not against the weight of, the evidence (see, Matter of Classic Coach v Mercado, 280 AD2d 164, lv denied 97 NY2d 601). The trial court’s rulings did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The jury’s award to plaintiff of $500,000 for emotional distress did not, under the circumstances presented, materially deviate from what is reasonable compensation. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 343, 739 N.Y.S.2d 125, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davies-v-maroc-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack