Davies v. Kane
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and appellant’s opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
The Clerk shall send appellant a copy of the public docket in number 07-74337.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
285 F. App'x 473 (Davies v. Kane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.