Davies v. Kalbfleisch
62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873
This text of 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (Davies v. Kalbfleisch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davies v. Kalbfleisch, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
The exceptions at pages 12 and 18 were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of [874]*874his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614; 48 St. Rep. 73. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Niebuhr v. Schreyer
135 N.Y. 614 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davies-v-kalbfleisch-nycityct-1894.