Davies v. Kalbfleisch
9 Misc. 710, 29 N.Y.S. 1142
Opinion
The exceptions were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614.
The judgment and order denying new trial shpuld be affirmed, with costs.
Present: Clement, Ch. J., and Van Wyck, J.
Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davies v. Kalbfleisch, 9 Misc. 710, 29 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
9 Misc. 710 (Davies v. Kalbfleisch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Niebuhr v. Schreyer
135 N.Y. 614 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)