Davies v. Davies's

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Davies v. Davies's

7 F. Cas. 44, 2 D.C. 105, 2 Cranch 105

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1814·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

permitted the evidence to go to the jury, not as conclusive, but primá facie evidence of the execution of the bond.

The Court also permitted Isaac Entwirtle to be examined as a witness for the defendant, although he was her surety in her administration bond; on the authority of the case in Esp. N. P. 163, and the case of Carter v. Pearce, 1 T. R. 163. See also Craig v. Reintzel, post.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

permitted the evidence to go to the jury, not as conclusive, but primá facie evidence of the execution of the bond.

The Court also permitted Isaac Entwirtle to be examined as a witness for the defendant, although he was her surety in her administration bond; on the authority of the case in Esp. N. P. 163, and the case of Carter v. Pearce, 1 T. R. 163. See also Craig v. Reintzel, post.

Davies v. Davies's, 7 F. Cas. 44, 2 D.C. 105, 2 Cranch 105 (circtddc 1814).

Pincite

7 F. Cas. 44 (Davies v. Davies's) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related