Davies v. Davies's

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Davies v. Davies's

7 F. Cas. 44, 2 D.C. 105, 2 Cranch 105

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1814

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 F. Cas. 44 (Davies v. Davies's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davies v. Davies's, 7 F. Cas. 44, 2 D.C. 105, 2 Cranch 105 (circtddc 1814).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

permitted the evidence to go to the jury, not as conclusive, but primá facie evidence of the execution of the bond.

The Court also permitted Isaac Entwirtle to be examined as a witness for the defendant, although he was her surety in her administration bond; on the authority of the case in Esp. N. P. 163, and the case of Carter v. Pearce, 1 T. R. 163. See also Craig v. Reintzel, post.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

permitted the evidence to go to the jury, not as conclusive, but primá facie evidence of the execution of the bond.

The Court also permitted Isaac Entwirtle to be examined as a witness for the defendant, although he was her surety in her administration bond; on the authority of the case in Esp. N. P. 163, and the case of Carter v. Pearce, 1 T. R. 163. See also Craig v. Reintzel, post.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 F. Cas. 44, 2 D.C. 105, 2 Cranch 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davies-v-daviess-circtddc-1814.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack