Davies v. Davies

824 So. 2d 326, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12365, 2002 WL 1971916
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davies v. Davies. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12355
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 2002·No. Nos. 1D01-5075, 1D02-240·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal from post-dissolution orders entered by the trial court, we affirm the trial court’s award of attorney’s fee entitlement as a sanction in the contempt proceeding. See, e.g., Poe v. Poe, 811 So.2d 789, 789-90 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Becker v. Becker, 778 So.2d 438, 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Worthington v. Harty, 677 So.2d 1371, 1371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Mettler v. Mettler, 569 So.2d 496, 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). We find, however, that appellant should have been afforded an opportunity to be heard regarding the amount of the fee awarded. See, e.g., Simpson v. Simpson, 780 So.2d 985, 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Broyles v. Broyles, 573 So.2d 357, 361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Accordingly, the fee order is VACATED and REMANDED for further proceedings. [327]*327In all other respects, the orders on appeal are AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davies v. Davies, 824 So. 2d 326, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12365, 2002 WL 1971916 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

824 So. 2d 326 (Davies v. Davies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broyles v. Broyles
573 So. 2d 357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Mettler v. Mettler
569 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Becker v. Becker
778 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Worthington v. Harty
677 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Simpson v. Simpson
780 So. 2d 985 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Poe v. Poe
811 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)