Davidson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
This text of 342 S.E.2d 523 (Davidson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that he is entitled to recover under his “underinsured motorist” coverage provided in his automobile liability policy issued by defendant. Both the trial court and a majority of the Court of Appeals, one judge dissenting, concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to any benefits under his underinsured motorist coverage. We agree. The decision of the Court of Appeals is, therefore,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
342 S.E.2d 523, 316 N.C. 551, 1986 N.C. LEXIS 2150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-nc-1986.