Davidson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
342 S.E.2d 523, 316 N.C. 551, 1986 N.C. LEXIS 2150
Opinion
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that he is entitled to recover under his “underinsured motorist” coverage provided in his automobile liability policy issued by defendant. Both the trial court and a majority of the Court of Appeals, one judge dissenting, concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to any benefits under his underinsured motorist coverage. We agree. The decision of the Court of Appeals is, therefore,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davidson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 342 S.E.2d 523, 316 N.C. 551, 1986 N.C. LEXIS 2150 (N.C. 1986).
342 S.E.2d 523 (Davidson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
418 S.E.2d 680 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)
Webb v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
605 A.2d 1344 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1992)
Sproles v. Greene
394 S.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Davidson v. Knauff Insurance Agency, Inc.
376 S.E.2d 488 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1989)
Manning v. Fletcher
371 S.E.2d 770 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)