Davidson v. State Tax Commission
This text of 2 Or. Tax 120 (Davidson v. State Tax Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an income tax assessment.
Plaintiff Walter C. Davidson worked for Safeway Stores and participated in the company retirement plan for employees. In 1960 he retired and withdrew all his interest in the fund. The State Tax Commission treated the amount received as income and plaintiff contends it should have been treated as a sale of a capital asset.
Under ORS 316.110, the payment made to an employee under a retirement plan shall be taxed to the *121 employee in the year of receipt. In 1963, the legislature passed ORS 316.411 allowing such payment to be treated by the employee as a sale of a capital asset. Unfortunately for plaintiff, however, he had retired in 1960 and the law was not changed until 1963.
The statute allowing such payment to be treated as a capital asset was by its very terms made prospective from January 1, 1963, and not retroactive. ①
In addition, the withdrawal of the fund even prior to the enactment of ORS 316.411 could not qualify as a “sale or exchange.” 3B, Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 22.92.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Or. Tax 120, 1965 Ore. Tax LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-state-tax-commission-ortc-1965.