Davidson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Davidson v. State

1923 OK CR 101, 214 P. 1119, 23 Okla. Crim. 302, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 218

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 30, 1923

DocketNo. A-4559.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 101 (Davidson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davidson v. State, 1923 OK CR 101, 214 P. 1119, 23 Okla. Crim. 302, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 218 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charley, Davidson, convicted in the county court of Nowata county on an information charging the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 90 days and to pay a fine of $250 and the costs. From the judgment rendered on the 27th day of April, A. D. 1923, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on February 1, 1923, a¡ petition in error with ease-made. The plaintiff in error, by his counsel of record, has filed a motion to dismiss his said appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the cause dismissed, and remanded to the county court of Nowata county. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charley, Davidson, convicted in the county court of Nowata county on an information charging the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 90 days and to pay a fine of $250 and the costs. From the judgment rendered on the 27th day of April, A. D. 1923, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on February 1, 1923, a¡ petition in error with ease-made. The plaintiff in error, by his counsel of record, has filed a motion to dismiss his said appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the cause dismissed, and remanded to the county court of Nowata county. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 101, 214 P. 1119, 23 Okla. Crim. 302, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.