Home/Michigan Court of Appeals/Davidson v. State Highway Commissioner

Davidson v. State Highway Commissioner

180 N.W.2d 212, 24 Mich. App. 285, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1697
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 1, 1970
DocketDocket No. 7,469
StatusPublished

This text of 180 N.W.2d 212 (Davidson v. State Highway Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davidson v. State Highway Commissioner, 180 N.W.2d 212, 24 Mich. App. 285, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1697 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon motion of the defendant the court of claims dismissed plaintiff’s cause of action for lack of progress. UCR 1963, 501.3. Plaintiff has appealed arguing that this was an abuse of discretion. The record clearly supports the action of the trial judge. The argument is without merit. Corley v. Krawczak (1969), 16 Mich App 176; People v. Tolbert (1970) 23 Mich App 566; Spalding v. Spalding (1959), 355 Mich 382.

Affirmed, no costs, defendants not having filed a brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corley v. Krawczak
167 N.W.2d 783 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)
Spalding v. Spalding
94 N.W.2d 810 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1959)
People v. Tolbert
179 N.W.2d 254 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 N.W.2d 212, 24 Mich. App. 285, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-state-highway-commissioner-michctapp-1970.