Davidson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davidson v. State

93 S.E.2d 189, 93 Ga. App. 895, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 888

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 16, 1956

Docket36206

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E.2d 189 (Davidson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davidson v. State, 93 S.E.2d 189, 93 Ga. App. 895, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 888 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Townsend, J.

“The theory that he [the defendant] committed the offense through misfortune or accident was raised solely by his statement to the jury, and, therefore, under repeated decisions of the Supreme Court and of this court, the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on that theory was not error in the absence of an appropriate written request.” Tyler v. State, 42 Ga. App. 287 (1) (155 S. E. 786). Sec also Eich v. State, 169 Ga. 425 (5) (150 S. E. 579); Moss v. State, 43 Ga. App. 109, 110 (6) (158 S. E. 461). Where, as here, the defendant was indicted for murder and convicted of voluntary manslaughter, and offered no evidence but in his statement to the jury contended that the pistol with which the killing had been inflicted had been discharged by accident while he and the person killed were both seeking to gain possession of it, the single special ground of the amended motion for a now trial complaining that the trial court erred in failing to charge without request the principles of Code § 26-404 providing that one shall not be found guilty of any crime committed by misfortune or accident, where it satisfactorily appears that there is no evil design, intention, or culpable neglect, is without merit. The general grounds are not insisted upon and are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed,.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Townsend, J.

“The theory that he [the defendant] committed the offense through misfortune or accident was raised solely by his statement to the jury, and, therefore, under repeated decisions of the Supreme Court and of this court, the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on that theory was not error in the absence of an appropriate written request.” Tyler v. State, 42 Ga. App. 287 (1) (155 S. E. 786). Sec also Eich v. State, 169 Ga. 425 (5) (150 S. E. 579); Moss v. State, 43 Ga. App. 109, 110 (6) (158 S. E. 461). Where, as here, the defendant was indicted for murder and convicted of voluntary manslaughter, and offered no evidence but in his statement to the jury contended that the pistol with which the killing had been inflicted had been discharged by accident while he and the person killed were both seeking to gain possession of it, the single special ground of the amended motion for a now trial complaining that the trial court erred in failing to charge without request the principles of Code § 26-404 providing that one shall not be found guilty of any crime committed by misfortune or accident, where it satisfactorily appears that there is no evil design, intention, or culpable neglect, is without merit. The general grounds are not insisted upon and are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed,.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.E.2d 189, 93 Ga. App. 895, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-state-gactapp-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack