Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Davidson v. State

Davidson v. State

638 So. 2d 626, 1994 WL 316290
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 1994
Docket94-1120
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 638 So. 2d 626 (Davidson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davidson v. State, 638 So. 2d 626, 1994 WL 316290 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

638 So.2d 626 (1994)

Lindel Ray DAVIDSON, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 94-1120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 1994.

Lindel Ray Davidson, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

As the purported recantation testimony is neither sworn nor particularized, and there is no showing how (if at all) the claimed recantation would have affected the trial, the trial court was entirely correct in denying the motion for postconviction relief as facially insufficient.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rolle v. State
56 So. 3d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Moss v. State
943 So. 2d 946 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Moran v. State
651 So. 2d 834 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
638 So. 2d 626, 1994 WL 316290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.