Davidson v. State
This text of 95 So. 54 (Davidson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“Something which is offensive to chastity, that which is offensive to chastity and modesty.”
The affirmative charge as requested was properly refused; but for the error pointed out the judgmeht is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 So. 54, 19 Ala. App. 77, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-state-alactapp-1923.