Davidson v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Davidson v. Maryland

367 F. App'x 415

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2010·No. No. 09-6679·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Elliott Davidson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Davidson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davidson v. Maryland, No. 1:08-cv-00524-WDQ (D.Md. Feb. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Elliott Davidson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Davidson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davidson v. Maryland, No. 1:08-cv-00524-WDQ (D.Md. Feb. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Davidson v. Maryland, 367 F. App'x 415 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

367 F. App'x 415 (Davidson v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related