Davidson v. James

172 A.D.2d 323
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 172 A.D.2d 323 (Davidson v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davidson v. James, 172 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Order and Judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on February 26, 1990, which dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners, former members of the Board of Governors of respondent National Arts Club, Inc. ("NAC”) commenced the underlying special proceeding pursuant to section 618 of the Not-For-Profit Corporation Law seeking, inter alia, to set aside the May 2, 1989 election of respondents Joan Brandt and [324]*324Chen Chi as directors of respondent NAC; to vacate the May 2, 1989 election of all directors and officers as illegal, null and void; to declare a new election of the Board, and to restore the petitioners to their former positions as directors of respondent NAC.

The IAS court properly determined that the Board of Governors of respondent NAC had the inherent power to remove the petitioners for cause, where the petitioners’ commencement of personal injury actions against respondent NAC and searching its records for confidential information as to the nature and extent of insurance coverage, was in breach of their fiduciary obligations to NAC as members of its Board of Governors, and contrary to the interest of the organization. (Matter of Grace v Grace Inst., 19 NY2d 307, 313; Not-For-Profit Corporation Law § 706 [a].)

Petitioners have failed to make a showing warranting court intervention into the internal affairs of respondent NAC pursuant to section 618 of the Not-For-Profit Corporation Law where there is no indication that the petitioners’ removal was tainted by fraud or other wrongdoing (Matter of Scipioni v Young Womens Christian Assn., 105 AD2d 1113). Concur— Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eager v. American Mensa, Ltd.
2025 NY Slip Op 33011(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2025)
Hyman v. Cummings
2024 NY Slip Op 30945(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Parisi v. New York County Medical Society
177 A.D.2d 369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D.2d 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-james-nyappdiv-1991.