Davidson v. Hicks

38 Misc. 2d 858, 238 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 30, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 Misc. 2d 858 (Davidson v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davidson v. Hicks, 38 Misc. 2d 858, 238 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The stipulations were unaccompanied by an affidavit as required by section 155 of the Nassau County District Court Act. (L. 1939, ch. 274, as amd. by L. 1939, ch. 719.) Accordingly the trial court lacked jurisdiction to render judgment.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.

Hart, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

General Accident Group v. Noonan
66 Misc. 2d 528 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Misc. 2d 858, 238 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-hicks-nyappterm-1962.