Davidson v. Hicks
This text of 38 Misc. 2d 858 (Davidson v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The stipulations were unaccompanied by an affidavit as required by section 155 of the Nassau County District Court Act. (L. 1939, ch. 274, as amd. by L. 1939, ch. 719.) Accordingly the trial court lacked jurisdiction to render judgment.
The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.
Hart, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 Misc. 2d 858, 238 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-hicks-nyappterm-1962.