Davidson v. Henop
7 F. Cas. 33, 1 Cranch 280
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1805
StatusPublished
This text of 7 F. Cas. 33 (Davidson v. Henop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davidson v. Henop, 7 F. Cas. 33, 1 Cranch 280 (circtddc 1805).
Opinion
THE COURT was of opinion that the plaintiff was not obliged to produce the promissory note mentioned in the declaration, but that the defendant held the affirmative of the issue, and had a right to begin and close the argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 F. Cas. 33, 1 Cranch 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-henop-circtddc-1805.