Davidson v. Grand Trunk Elevator Co.
This text of 56 N.W. 852 (Davidson v. Grand Trunk Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is certiorari from an order of a circuit court commissioner of St. Clair county removing , this cause to Wayne county.
The petition prayed for the removal of' the cause to Wayne county, but the only basis for removal to that county set forth in the- petition, or that appears to have [458]*458been urged, is that Elliott G-. Stevenson, “ counsel for defendant,” resides in that county. Plaintiff’s counsel urged a removal to Macomb county, and objected to a removal to Wayne. No testimony was taken. The order of removal recites that “the facts in said petition being admitted” by the attorney for plaintiff, and “it further appearing that said Elliott Gr. Stevenson, counsel for said defendant, resides in the county of Wayne, it is ordered,” etc.
It was held in Stimson v. Shingle Co., 71 Mich. 374, and later in Bolles v. Loan & Trust Co., 86 Id. 229, that How. Stat. § 6499, applies only to a party or the attorney or solicitor of record, and that the removal of a cause to a county could not be based upon the residence in that [459]*459comity of “counsel” who was not the attorney of record.
The order of the circuit court commissioner must therefore be set aside, with costs to plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 N.W. 852, 97 Mich. 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-grand-trunk-elevator-co-mich-1893.